Issue:
Whether given the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the Court of Appeal was right in holding that the trial court had jurisdiction to hear and deterrnine the Respondent’s suit? (Grounds 1, 2 & 3)”
August 2025
Action: Ouster Clause – where an Ouster Clause is inserted in the statute and in the constitution – differences thereto – the principle in Inakoju & Ors. Vs. Adeleke & Ors. (2007) LPELR -1510(SC)
Action: Decision therein – whether all cases must decided on their peculiar facts and circumstances
Court: Judicial process – where a party undermines the judicial process – whether a court abhor such an act which tends to undermine the judicial process
Court: Ouster Clauses – approach of court thereto – the principle in Idowu Ibiowotisi & 4 Ors. Vs. PA Bakare Agbaye & Anor (unreported)
Jurisdiction: National Industrial Court – jurisdiction thereof
Judgment & Orders: Alleged conflicts in two decisions of the Supreme Court – when arises – whether decisions should not be read out of context – the principle in Adegoke Motors Ltd. Vs. Adesanya & Anor (1989) LPELR -94(SC)
Jurisdiction: Sources – relevance thereof
Jurisdiction: When Court is said to have jurisdiction – the principle in Madukolu vs. Nkemdilim (1962)2 SCNLR 341
Master & Servant: Dismissal of a servant – where letter of dismissal was not signed by the appropriate authority – effect thereof – the principle in Jombo vs. Petroleum Equalisation Fund (Management Board) supra
Master & servant: Dismissal of an employee – connotation thereof
Master & Servant: Dismissal and termination – differences therein – the principle in Jombo vs. Petroleum Equalisation Fund (Management Board)(2005)14 NWLR (Pt.945)443
Master & Servant: Dismissal and termination – where an employee whose employment has earlier been terminated is subsequently dismissed – whether the dismissal is futile and of no effect
Parties: Manipulation of the adjudicatory process – where a litigant manipulates the adjudicatory process – attitude of court thereto – the principle in Garba vs. F. C. S. C & Anor (1988)1 NWLR (PT.71) p.449-470
Statute: Decree No.17 of 1984 – Ouster of jurisdiction of court – relevant principles
Stare decisis: Conflict in decision – where there are conflicts in two decisions of the Supreme Court – proper approach thereto
Stare decisis: Conflict in decisions of the Supreme Court – when it occurs
Stare decisis: Previous decisions – how distinguished
Stare decisis: Jombo vs. Petroleum Equalisation Fund (Management Board) (supra) – whether similar to the present case
Words and Phrases: Jurisdiction – meaning
Words and Phrases: Ouster Clause – meaning
Words and Phrases: Appropriate authority – meaning – Decree No.17 of 1984 considered
Words and Phrases: Public officer – meaning – Decree No.17 of 1984 considered – Sec. 4(1) of the Decree No.17 of 1984 considered
Issue:
Whether given the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the Court of Appeal was right in holding that the trial court had jurisdiction to hear and deterrnine the Respondent’s suit? (Grounds 1, 2 & 3)”